During Septorhinoplasty (SRP), alar base interventions are performed frequently, when the interalar distance exceeds the intercanthal distance or the lateral aspect of the ala extends considerably beyond the alar-facial groove.1 Formation of scar on the face may disturb the patient due to cosmetic concerns. Factors such as the incision and closure technique or postoperative care play a key role in the formation of visible scars after SRP.2–4 One of the major factors affecting the scar outcome is probably the suture material used. Although the use of prolene suture is classically preferred in the alar flare region,1–3,5 absorbable suture is preferred by some surgeons recently, as it eliminates the need for much more suture removal and saves office time.

In a meta-analysis of 10 randomized-controlled studies on sutures, absorbable and non-absorbable sutures were found to be similar in terms of operative morbidities, and there was insufficient data on cosmetic outcomes.6 Although absorbable sutures were reported to provide favorable cosmetic outcomes on skin wounds,7,8 there are still opposing views in the literature.9

To the best of authors’ knowledge, there is no study investigating scar outcomes of alar flare region using different sutures in the literature. In the present study, the objective was to investigate the scar outcomes using absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in the alar flare region in early- and long-term healing period after SRP.

Of a total of 31 patients included in the study, 1 (7%) was male and 14 (93%) were females in the PG group and 2 (12.5%) were males and 14 (87.5%) were females in the PP group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of sex distribution (p =  0.52). The mean age was 26.5 ± 8.5 (range, 20–54) and 29.5 ± 9.8 (range, 19–56) years in the PG and PP groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean age of the patients between the PG and PP groups (p =  0.45). Wound infection, dehiscence or significant wideness of the scar were not seen in either group. The mean time to patient questionnaire was 16.9 ± 5.2 and 20.1 ± 7.6 months in the PG and PP groups, respectively (p =  0.18).

The mean total score corresponding to Fitzpatrcik skin type of the groups was 22.6 ± 6.5 and 22.7 ± 6.1 in the PG group and PP group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the total scores of Fitzpatrcik skin type of the patients between the PG and PP groups (p = 0.95). The distribution of the patients according to the Fitzpatrick skin type scale and the p-values are detailed in Table 2. The mean patient questionnaire total score was 8 ± 2.4 and 9.2 ± 1.4 in the PG group and PP group, respectively (Table 3). There was no statistically significant difference in the patient questionnaire scores between the PG and PP groups (p = 0.35).

The mean modified SBSES score was 4.7 ± 1 and 4.8 ± 1.2 at one month in the PG and PP group, respectively. At twelve months, the mean scores were 5 ± 1.3 and 5.3 ± 0.9 in the PG and PP group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the modified SBSES scores at one and twelve months between the PG and PP groups (p =  0.66, p =  0.84). Detailed SBSES scores of the groups are shown in Table 4. There were two patients (6%) who considered dermabrasion for their scar revision. Both of these patients were in PG group.

In the present study, scar outcomes of alar flare region using PP and irradiated PG sutures were compared in patients undergoing SRP. The early- and long-term assessment of the modified SBSES and long-term patient questionnaire scores did not significantly differ according to the use of absorbable or non-absorbable suture materials. To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine scar outcomes of alar flare region using different sutures in the literature.

Wound healing is a complex process consisting of inflammation, proliferation, and maturation phases. It has been reported that the time it takes to heal a wound at the age of 20 can be doubled for a 40-year-old individual.15 In addition, the increased incidence of comorbidities with age may lead to delayed wound healing and poor scar quality. In the current study, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age.

In the PP group, the patient questionnaire scores were higher. The modified SBSES scores of the PP group at one and twelve months were also better than the PG group. The outcomes of early- and long-term modified SBSES scores and long-term patient questionnaire scores were comparable. Although better results were achieved with the use of PP sutures in the alar flare region, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. More intriguingly, on detailed examination of the patient questionnaire, the PG group had considerably lower ‘satisfaction’ scores compared to the PP group. Despite this low score, the PG group had a closer score in ‘need to hide’ item to the PP group. This may be a reflection of the increased self-confidence of the patients after SRP.

Verim et al.13 reported that skin thickness and types were not determinants of columellar scar healing in Turkish population. In our study there was no statistically significant difference in terms of skin types of distribution in the PP and PG groups. However, since this was not the aim of this study, a comparison between skin types and SBSES scores on the alar flare region was not made.

Kriedel et al.1 reported that increased density of sebaceous glands in the area of the alar-facial groove undoubtedly played a role in the visibility of Weir incisions. It has been proposed that this sebaceous nature may lead to a predisposition to epithelial cysts and micro-abscess formation during healing period, which may cause to a visible scar. Also, a large number of muscles have been described that can cause wound tension in the alar flare region. The dilatator naris muscle and the alar portion of the nasalis muscle insert directly onto the alar skin,16 and the levator labii superioris partially inserts on the vestibular skin of the nasal vestibule.17 Daniel et al.18 showed that lower nasal base was not an isolated, static structure, but rather a very dynamic form integrated into the nasal superficial musculoaponeurotic system and even the entire facial musculature. In addition, Parell et al.7 found in their study about scar outcomes of facial skin wounds, that a wound over a bony structure might be with an increased wound tension. The edges of the alar flare reduction may be subject to severe traction due to the many surrounding muscles and the bony structure underneath. These anatomical and physiological features may cause poor scar outcomes and satisfaction due to the increased wound tension in patients with alar flare reduction.

The PP sutures are non-absorbable, monofilament, unlikely to break prematurely, and elicit a minimal inflammatory response. However, due to the springy nature of these sutures, there may be difficulties in tying with a tendency to unravel. Also, suture removal may cause patient discomfort and waste of office time. The PG sutures are absorbable, easier to tie, and do not need to be removed, thereby reducing patient discomfort, and saving office time. On the other hand, due to their absorbable and braided nature, they may cause inflammation and tend to promote infection.7,10 In two animal experiments and a research article which examines full thickness skin grafts, low inflammation and local reactions were observed with the use of PG.19–21 Parell et al.7 found no significant difference in the long-term cosmetic outcomes on facial skin wounds between the PP and PG use. On the other hand, there is one study reporting that color change and hypertrophic scar lasting up to one year were detected with the use of PG in inframammary skin closure.22 In current study, the inflammation signs were compared by grading color changes in the early- and long-term period. There was no statistically significant difference in the early- and long-term inflammation signs between the PP and PG groups.

Dermabrasion is the most accessible and most studied technique for scar resurfacing. This procedure improves wound contour and color match to surrounding skin using sterile sandpaper or diamond burs.23 In the literature, the rate of dermabrasion after alar flare reduction has been reported as 0%–25%.1–3,24 In the present study, the patients who considered dermabrasion for their scar was 6% (2/31). Among these, two patients in the PG group, one had hatching (Fig. 2) and the other had depressed scar and notching.

Figure 2.

Hatching at right side of the patients’ alar flare region. Notching at left side of the patients’ alar flare region at 12-months of follow-up.

(0.11MB).

As described by Kriedel et al.,1 an important factor to contribute to notching is carrying the modified Weir incision into the deep muscle layer in the alar flare region. During alar region interventions, adhering a conservative plan with basic surgical principles such as precise and right-angle cut on the skin, eversion of the wound edges during closure and meticulous postoperative care may provide good scar outcomes. Also, stitches should not be too tight to prevent hatching. During postoperative care, antibiotic ointment and meticulous cleaning of clustering should be applied. Therefore, meticulous attention should be paid during alar region interventions and in postoperative care.

The main strength of this study is that it examines the effect of selected suture material on scar outcomes in alar flare region at early- and long-term period based on subjective and single-blinded objective methods. Main limitation of this study is its retrospective nature, small sample size. Statistical power analysis could not have performed on the data set due to small sample size. Although the patients evaluated regarding their skin type, no comparison was made between the groups in terms of skin thickness. Last limitation of this study is that genetic, environmental, and systemic factors such as diabetes mellitus, smoking and hypoproteinemia that may adversely affect wound healing apart from age were unable to be evaluated among the groups.

In conclusion, the study results showed that, although not statistically significant, PG has worse scar outcomes on alar base compared to PP. This study is valuable as it contributes to the literature with examining the effect of different suture materials on the cosmetic outcomes of the alar flare region. It is concluded that both PG and PP sutures can be used for closure considering their advantages and disadvantages, in patients with alar flare reduction. Nevertheless, further large-scale, prospective, randomized studies are needed to draw more reliable conclusions on this subject.

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not‐for‐profit sectors.

Prior to surgery, all patients were informed, and a written informed consent was obtained for all diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. An additional consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of images in Figs. 1 and 2.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Thanks to Prof. Dr. Murat Songu for his valuable advices and technical editing.