Long term results following nasal septal surgery: Focus on patients’ satisfaction
Introduction
Nasal obstruction is the most common chronic complaint in every-day rhinological practice. The clinician is often confronted with the question whether the presence of a septal deformity is the main cause of the obstruction. The answer is not always clear. Surgeons often trust their subjective assessment regarding the severity of the nasal obstruction in order to decide on therapeutic management, which often involves surgery. It is therefore not surprising that some investigators criticise the number of unnecessary septoplasties performed each year [1]. Accurate preoperative evaluation is very important as other causes of nasal obstruction frequently tend to be underestimated when the surgeon focuses his attention to an obviously deviated septum. On the other hand patients’ expectations from surgery are often different from those of surgeons’.
The aim of this study was to analyze the long term outcome of nasal septal surgery using previously published standardized questionnaires. We assessed the impact of surgery on patient's general health status and quality of life, and evaluated the accuracy of patients’ selection for septal surgery as depicted by the patients’ satisfaction 2–3 years postoperatively.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
In this prospective study we included 67 consecutive patients, who underwent septoplasty over a one-year period (January–December 2001) in a District General Hospital. Fifty-three percent were male and fourty percent were female with a mean age of 29.2 years (age range 18–55 years).
Patients, who underwent other ENT procedures such as surgery to the inferior turbinates, rhinoplasty and sinus surgery concomitant to septal surgery, were excluded from this study.
The assessment of patients included
Results
Information about the study and questionnaires were mailed to ail 67 patients, who underwent septopiasty. We were unable to locate two patients who changed their address after surgery. During the first month from the initial mail, 44 patients responded and returned the questionnaires. Seven more patients responded to our second mail giving a final response rate of 76% (51 patients). We consider these responders to be representative of the characteristics of the entire group of patients, because
Discussion
Outcome research is becoming a significant factor in analysis of clinical practice, and many authors have reported septoplasty outcome results. However, many of them were retrospective, some were not patient oriented assessments, and others used non-validated questionnaires [5], [6], [8], [9], [10]. Studies on patients’ satisfaction reported high satisfaction levels after septoplasty, but their results were postoperative evaluation in the short-term [6], [8].
This study is prospective with a
Conclusion
The principal benefits of septal surgery are related to improvement in nasal symptoms. In this study GBI results did not reflect a significant change in health status from septoplasty even in the above criterion group. The significant percentage of patients who did not report satisfaction in the long term poses a question regarding the objectivity of surgeons’ criteria for nasal septal surgery. It also indicates that positive evaluation by patients of septal surgery outcome tends to be
References (16)
- et al.
Septoplasty: long term evaluation of results
Am J Otolaryngol
(2002) - et al.
Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the nasal obstruction septoplasty effectiveness (NOSE) study
Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg
(2004) - et al.
Selection with and without rhinomanometry of patients for septoplasty
Am J Rhinol
(1989) - et al.
Assessment of patient benefit from septo-rhinoplasty with the use of Glasgow benefit inventory (GBI) and nasal symptom questionnaire (NSQ)
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg
(2003) - et al.
Reliability and validity of a nasal symptom questionnaire for use as an outcome measure in clinical research and audit of functional endoscopic sinus surgery
Clin Otolaryngol
(1993) - et al.
Measuring patient benefit from otorhinoiaryngological surgery and therapy
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
(1996) - et al.
Assessment of patient's benefit from rhinoplasty
Rhinology
(1996) - et al.
Nasal septal surgery: evaluation of symptomatic and general health outcomes
Clin Otolaryngol
(2001)
Cited by (101)
Functional assessment of septo(rhino)plasty revision surgery
2024, European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck DiseasesComparison of crushed cartilage used and not used as camouflage grafts in patients who had undergone septorhinoplasty
2022, American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and SurgeryThe systolic pulmonary artery pressure and the E/e’ ratio decrease after septoplasty in patients with grade 2 and 3 pure nasal septal deviation
2021, Brazilian Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyCitation Excerpt :Accordingly, reliable methods are needed in otolaryngology practice to approve the accuracy of indications for septal surgery. Nevertheless, the use of objective methods for this aim is controversial and there is no consensus on an objective assessment tool for NSD.15,16 For these reasons, in the present study, the Turkish version of the NOSE questionnaire was administered to each patient both preoperatively and at three months postoperatively.
Évaluation fonctionnelle des reprises chirurgicales de septo(rhino)plasties
2024, Annales Francaises d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-FacialeSeptoplasty: early (first year) and late (fourth year) post-operative results in 604 patients
2022, Journal of Laryngology and Otology