Language development in Japanese children who receive cochlear implant and/or hearing aid

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.12.027Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate a wide variety of factors that influence auditory, speech, and language development following pediatric cochlear implantation (CI).

Study design

Prospective collection of language tested data in profound hearing-impaired children.

Hypothesis

Pediatric CI can potentially be effective to development of practical communication skills and early implantation is more effective.

Methods

We proposed a set of language tests (assessment package of the language development for Japanese hearing-impaired children; ALADJIN) consisting of communication skills testing (test for question–answer interaction development; TQAID), comprehensive (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised; PVT-R and Standardized Comprehension Test for Abstract Words; SCTAW) and productive vocabulary (Word Fluency Test; WFT), and comprehensive and productive syntax (Syntactic processing Test for Aphasia; STA). Of 638 hearing-impaired children recruited for this study, 282 (44.2%) with >70 dB hearing impairment had undergone CI. After excluding children with low birth weight (<1800 g), those with >11 points on the Pervasive Developmental Disorder ASJ Rating Scale for the test of autistic tendency, and those <2 SD on Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices for the test of non-verbal intelligence, 190 children were subjected to this set of language tests.

Results

Sixty children (31.6%) were unilateral CI-only users, 128 (67.4%) were CI–hearing aid (HA) users, and 2 (1.1%) were bilateral CI users. Hearing loss level of CI users was significantly (p < 0.01) worse than that of HA-only users. However, the threshold level, maximum speech discrimination score, and speech intelligibility rating in CI users were significantly (p < 0.01) better than those in HA-only users. The scores for PVT-R (p < 0.01), SCTAW, and WFT in CI users were better than those in HA-only users. STA and TQAID scores in CI–HA users were significantly (p < 0.05) better than those in unilateral CI-only users. The high correlation (r = 0.52) has been found between the age of CI and maximum speech discrimination score. The scores of speech and language tests in the implanted children before 24 months of age have been better than those in the implanted children after 24 months of age.

Conclusions

We could indicate that CI was effective for language development in Japanese hearing-impaired children and early CI was more effective for productive vocabulary and syntax.

Introduction

Management of CI in infants and children is one of the most striking advances for congenital severe to profound hearing loss. Several studies have shown that early implantation can be beneficial not only for speech perception, but also for the development of speech and language [1], [2], [3]. Moreover, early intervention for children with hearing loss facilitates successful educational integration at the earliest possible age [4].

More than 20 years have passed since the first pediatric CI surgery was performed in Japan. Many hearing-impaired children are now benefiting from this device. However, the long-term benefits for Japanese CI users have rarely been reported. In particular, language development after CI among Japanese children has not often been investigated. Language development outcomes among children with prelingual hearing impairment have been studied in Indo-European languages, but language differences may have an effect on language development in children with CI. In addition, differences in national and local education systems may make a difference to language development. To determine the effect of CI, we examined language development in different language and/or social systems.

Language differences may add other difficulties; for example, interpretation of Japanese language test results may not be comparable with that of English or other European language tests. To reduce these difficulties, we have established the assessment package of the language development for Japanese hearing-impaired children (ALADJIN) as a language performance evaluation tool for hearing-impaired children. ALADJIN includes several Japanese language tests that are directly comparable with previously reported English tests, including the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PVT-R) and Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG)-like syntax tests (e.g., the Syntactic processing Test for Aphasia; STA). These tests all have their own distinctive emphasis and evaluate different aspects or domains of language.

In 2010, we assessed the current status of hearing-impaired children in Japan through a project called Research on Sensory and Communicative Disorders (RSCD). ALADJIN was used in this nationwide research project. The RSCD was originally intended to assess the effectiveness of interventional methods for hearing-impaired children. As part of the RSCD survey, we evaluated the domain-specific language status of Japanese hearing-impaired children with CI, not only in selected institutes and schools that potentially yield biases, but in a wide variety of institutes in Japan.

Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the development of interpersonal communication skills (IPCS) in hearing-impaired children with CI using the ALADJIN data set from the RSCD nationwide research project.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

All ALADJIN tests were conducted by trained audiologists, speech pathologists, or deaf school teachers in a noise-minimized compartment. Audiometry for evaluation of hearing level, pure-tone threshold, speech discrimination test, and speech intelligibility rating [5] were measured in a sound-attenuated room of the relevant hospital. The study design was approved by the ethics review board of the Association of Technical Aids.

Results

There were significant (p < 0.01) differences in the scores of average hearing loss level, average threshold level with hearing devices, maximum speech discrimination score, and speech intelligibility rating between CI users (unil CI-only or CI–HA users) and HA-only users (Fig. 4). Hearing loss level of CI users was significantly lower than that of HA-only users. However, the threshold level, maximum speech discrimination scores, and speech intelligibility rating of CI users were significantly

Discussion

To evaluate the language development in the typical hearing-impaired children, we have made exclusionary criteria to standardize the subjects in this study. We excluded the hearing-impaired children with birth weights <1800 g who scored >11 points on the PARS test and <2 SD on the RCPM. Very low birth weight children are at a high risk of neurosensory disability, including developmental delay, behavioral problems, and learning disabilities [14]. Long-term follow-up studies have also emphasized

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants of this study, including children, parents, and staff of the Research on Sensory and Communicative Disorders (RSCD) project who collaborated with the Association for Technical Aids (Tokyo, Japan). This work was supported by the Division of Hearing Impairment, RSCD of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (24)

  • The effects of narrative-based language intervention (NBLI) on spoken narrative structures in Persian-speaking cochlear implanted children: A prospective randomized control trial

    2018, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Traditionally, language evaluation and intervention programs for hearing-impaired children (especially those with cochlear implants) have predominantly focused on reinforcement of early-developing language skills, such as specific language forms, unique vocabulary items, word-order rules, phonological training and subject-verb agreement [16]. A number of studies have reported that receptive and expressive vocabulary [17], mean length of utterances [18], morpho-syntactic complexity [19], auditory perception of speech [20] and speech intelligibility [21] in children with cochlear implants (CI) could be improved using traditional procedures. It can be said that CIs have had considerable positive influence on verbal language development and simple sentence production in deaf children that allows them to satisfactorily pass through the early-developing language period [6], yet they are inevitably classified as having delayed language [22].

  • Laser-capture micro dissection combined with next-generation sequencing analysis of cell type-specific deafness gene expression in the mouse cochlea

    2017, Hearing Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Many factors, medical, educational, and environmental, are presumed to affect CI performance. With regard to the medical factors affecting CI outcomes, diagnostic age, pre-operative hearing thresholds, duration of pre-operative hearing loss, implantation timing, associated mental retardation or other complex symptoms have been reported (Artières et al., 2009; Kasai et al., 2012; Forli et al., 2011; Iwasaki et al., 2012; Beadle et al., 2005; Calmels et al., 2004 Birman et al., 2015). Recent advances in genetic analysis technology using Massively Parallel DNA Sequencing have accelerated the exploration of novel genes involved in deafness (Walsh et al., 2010; Rehman et al., 2010; Brownstein et al., 2011; Schraders et al., 2011; Azaiez et al., 2015) and also have made possible the comprehensive genetic testing of all known deafness-causing genes in a shorter period (Shearer et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2013; Mutai et al., 2013; Nishio and Usami, 2015, Nishio et al., 2015a).

  • Impact of early intervention on comprehensive language and academic achievement in Japanese hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants

    2015, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
    Citation Excerpt :

    They have now grown to school age, and many are attending mainstream schools and able to perform several language tests. There are reports suggesting good efficacy of CI [4] on language development in Japanese children with hearing impairment, but there are few reports concerning prognostic factors for language development and academic achievement by implanted children. In this study, we identified factors contributing to language development and academic achievement among CI users.

  • Noun plural production in preschoolers with early cochlear implantation: An experimental study of Dutch and German

    2015, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
    Citation Excerpt :

    These elements are often/mostly unstressed, perceptually less salient, and hence, less easily identifiable for children with a hearing impairment. Most studies thus far have presented a very broad picture of language development in the CI population, presenting general measures of expressive/receptive vocabulary and grammar [3,13–17]. There have been relatively few attempts to trace the development of specific language phenomena, such as the acquisition of noun, verb, or adjective morphology [7,8,18–20].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text