Journal Information
Vol. 75. Issue 6.
Pages 844-846 (November - December 2009)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
4511
Vol. 75. Issue 6.
Pages 844-846 (November - December 2009)
Original Article
Open Access
Noise Assessment in Intensive Care Units
Visits
4511
Ivan Senis Cardoso Macedo1,*, Daniela Cunha Mateus2, Eduardo De Martin Guedes C Costa3, Ana Cristina Lanfranchi Asprino4, Edmir Américo Lourenço5
1 Physician, trained at the Jundiai Medical School - Sao Paulo
2 4th year medical student at the Jundiai Medical School - Sao Paulo
3 4th year medical student at the Jundiai Medical School - Sao Paulo
4 1st year medical resident in Otorhinolaryngology, Jundiai Medical School - Sao Paulo
5 Department of Otolaryngology, Jundiai Medical School - Sao Paulo. Jundiai Medical School, Santo André - Sao Paulo
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (2)
Table 1. Description of parameters analyzed according to each unit.
Table 2. Percentage above recommended sound pressure levels measured in each ICU.
Show moreShow less
Summary

Intensive Care Units are environments with numerous noise sources. In different hospital environments it is recommended to have a sound pressure level between 35 and 45db(A).

Aim

To measure the sound pressure levels in three ICU at a hospital in Jundiaí, State of São Paulo, Brazil.

Study Design

Observational.

Materials and Methods

we used a Minipa model MSL1532C (USA) sound meter, according to the Brazilian Technical Standards (NBR 10151), in order to measure sound levels in the ICUs at different moments, that is, the morning, afternoon and night at peak times of activity.

Results

The values found during the checking of the sound pressure levels were 64.1dB (A) in the First ICU, 58.9 dB (A) in the Coronary Unit and 64dB (A) in the second ICU.

Conclusion

High sound pressure levels in ICU still mean an important health-related problem for patients in these units. None of the three ICU pad levels above 85dB, showing that there is no occupational risk for the health care teams in the environments studied.

Keywords:
environmental statistics
noise
intensive care units
Full Text
INTRODUCTION

Intensive care units (ICUs) contain many sources of noise, such as aspirators, monitors, mechanical ventilators, computers, printers, air conditioning vents, and others. Elevated sound pressure levels may cause stress, psychological disorders, and sleep disorders.1 Psychological effects due to loud noise may cause behavioral disorders and physiological responses to stress. Noise may also alter assessments of sedation.2, 3 The hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal system is sensitive to a sound pressure level of 65 dBA; at this level, high amounts of adrenalin, noradrenalin and corticosteroids are secreted, blood pressure may be elevated, the heart rate may be altered and there may be peripheral vasoconstriction.3 A further important issue is synergism between ototoxic drugs and high sound pressure levels, which increase the risk of hearing loss in patients.4–7 Comfortable noise levels are underestimated in hospitals; finding solutions to improve environmental quality - as related to the level of noise -when designing hospitals has been markedly difficult. The United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Brazilian Technical Standards Association (ABNT) have recommended sound pressure levels ranging from 35 to 45db (A) in various hospital settings.8, 9

The aim of this study was to measure sound pressure levels in three intensive care units (ICUs) of a Teaching Hospital in Jundiai, Sao Paulo State, Brazil.

METHODS

A Minipa model MSL-1532C (USA) model was used to measure sound levels in a first ICU, a second ICU, and a Coronary Care Unit (CCU) located in a hospital in Jundiai, Sao Paulo state, according to ABNT standards (NBR 10151). Data gathering and analysis were done following an evaluation and consent of the ICU directors and approval by the Institutional Review Board (protocol approval number FR-226570). Only the physician in charge in each shift was aware of the strategic placement of the sound level measuring device. Measurements were done during two hours per session (morning, afternoon and evening); the number of staff members in the environment being studied was recounted every 5 minutes. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics using Microsoft's® Excel 2000 software.

RESULTS

Measurement sound pressure level values were 64.1 dB (A) in the first ICU, 58.9 dB (A) in the CCU and 64 dB (A) in the second ICU. Table 1 shows minimum and maximum sound pressure levels, the mean number of staff on site, and the number of patients in each ICU.

Table 1.

Description of parameters analyzed according to each unit.

ParameterSite
First ICU  CCU  Second ICU 
Mean - dB (A)  64.1  58.9  64.0 
Low - dB (A)  57.0  51.9  55.9 
High - dB (A)  80.4  73.3  82.4 
Standard deviation  3.4  2.9  3.1 
Mean staff number on site  13  14 
Number of patients  13 

CCU: Coronary Care Unit, ICU: Intensive Care Unit.

Table 2 shows sound pressure levels as percentages above recommended values; measured according to the site.

Table 2.

Percentage above recommended sound pressure levels measured in each ICU.

ParameterLocal
First ICU  CCU  Second ICU 
Mean - dB (A)  42.4%  30.8%  42.2% 
Minimum  26.7%  15.4%  24.2% 
Maximum  78.7%  62.8%  83.1% 

CCU: Coronary Care Unit, ICU: Intensive Care Unit.

DISCUSSION

All ICUs in this study had mean sound pressure levels at least 30% over recommended values (ABNT and United States Environmental Protection Agency).8, 9 at no moment during measurements were these values within normal parameters for such institutions; this is a contributing factor to an increased morbidity in patients. Elevated sound pressure levels in hospital environments is common worldwide, as several studies have reported: a mean 60 to 65 dB (A) in an Austrian hospital, 55 dB (A) in the University of Valencia hospital, Spain, and 68 dB (A) in a hospital ICU in Manitoba, Canada;1 these findings are similar to our results.

Noise generated in ICUs has increased in recent decades due to a substantial increase in the number of devices with acoustic alarms, and background noise by actions and speaking of healthcare professionals. Patients and healthcare staff may be affected alike.3 There is a high risk of chronic occupational noise exposure, especially with complex tasks. Excessive and continuous noise exceeding 85 dB may cause physiological and psychological harm in healthcare teams, such as hypertension, altered heart rates and muscle tone, headaches, hearing loss, mental confusion, low attention span and irritability.3 However, we measured no values above 85dB in this study, showing that there was no occupational health risk for staff in the environments that were investigated.

The design of devices for intensive care units should take noise reduction into account. Noise should be a concern in procurement, installation and use of such devices, as changes at a later date may increase costs.10 Thus, awareness of this issue is important for critical care professionals and manufacturers of medical equipment. The amount of noise generated by each device should be established for efficient noise-reducing measure to be adopted, as noise in a workplace may originate from several sources.1, 3 Guidelines are important, as evidence suggests their relevance as part of training programs for healthcare professionals when attempting to change work sites.4 The main issue in such programs is controlling excessive noise to reduce its effects on human hearing, to decrease stress, and to have positive effects on healing. Information for healthcare team helps trigger behavioral changes. Important measures in routine work are: avoiding loud conversations close to patients, generating specific environments for clinical discussions; controlling bells, alarms, cell phones, pagers, televisions and radios, use of posters in critical areas, defining silence periods for sleep hours, during which sound alarms should be turned down or off if possible, and nursing interventions should be kept to a minimum in clinically stable patients. Other measures include collaboration of supporting staff (e.g.: janitors, laboratory and radiology technicians), and implementing continued education programs for ICU staff. Environmental measures include adjusting the ICU architecture by adding noise-absorbing floors, ceilings, and walls, physical separators between beds in larger units, rubber seals on doors and windows, and noise assessments prior to acquiring equipment.3

CONCLUSION

Sound pressure levels above ABNT and United States Environmental Protection Agency recommended values were found in three intensive care at a hospital in Jundiai, Sao Paulo State, Brazil, emphasizing a major inpatient morbidity issue.

At no time did the three ICUs have sound pressure levels over 85 dB, suggesting no occupational health risk to healthcare professionals at those sites.

REFERENCES
[1]
RP Pereira , RN Toledo , JLG Amaral , A Guilherme .
Qualificação e quantificação da exposição sonora ambiental em uma unidade de terapia intensiva geral.
Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol., 69 (2003), pp. 766-771
[2]
Freitas SF, Clímaco RSC. Análise do conforto sonoro em hospitais de Brasília. Disponível em http://www.unb.br/fau/pos_graduacao/paranoa/analise/hospitais.pdf. Acesso em 10 setembro 2008.
[3]
WB Carvalho , MLG Pedreira , MAL Aguiar .
Nível de ruídos em uma unidade de cuidados intensivos pediátricos.
J Pediatr., 81 (2005), pp. 495-498
[4]
CA Cmiel , DM Karr , DM Gasser , LM Oliphant , AJ Neveau .
Noise control: a nursing team's approach to sleep promotion: respecting the silence creates a healthier environment for your patients.
Am J Nurs., 104 (2004), pp. 40-48
[5]
DE Ray .
Function in neurotoxicity: index of effect and also determinant of vulnerability.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital., 18 (1998), pp. 55-58
[6]
BS Gendeh .
Vancomycin administration in continuing ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: The risk of ototoxicity.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 118 (1998), pp. 551-558
[7]
I Minoli , G Moro .
Constraints of intensive care units and follow-up studies in prematures.
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl., 421 (1985), pp. 62-67
[8]
Elaborado através da Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Comitê Brasileiro de Construção Civil. Acústica-Avaliação do ruído em áreas habitadas visando o conforto da comunidade - Procedimento. Norma Técnica. ABNT.NBR 1 0151; 1998 Nov. Projeto –2:135.01–003.
[9]
United States Environmental Protection Agency .
Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety, Government Printing Office, (1974),
[10]
MH Otenio , E Cremer , EMT Claro .
Noise level in a 222 bed hospital in the 18th health region - PR.
Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol., 73 (2007), pp. 245-250

Paper submitted to the BJORL-SGP (Publishing Management System – Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology) on September 16, 2008; and accepted on February 8, 2009. cod. 6040

Copyright © 2009. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
Announcement Nota importante
Articles submitted as of May 1, 2022, which are accepted for publication will be subject to a fee (Article Publishing Charge, APC) payment by the author or research funder to cover the costs associated with publication. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. All manuscripts must be submitted in English.. Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de maio de 2022, que forem aceitos para publicação estarão sujeitos a uma taxa (Article Publishing Charge, APC) a ser paga pelo autor para cobrir os custos associados à publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a esta revista, os autores concordam com esses termos. Todos os manuscritos devem ser submetidos em inglês.